Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus SYED MAZHAR ALAM

Pakistan Penal Code Section 409/109/34 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 32, neither approved in appeal against the acquittals. Was given, nor was he to benefit from the money presented to the co-accused by the Chairman of the Establishment, the NAB authorities withdrew the case against the aforementioned co-accused and to surrender before the accountability court. He was also excluded from the party which was very favorable to him. To be shown to an accused who was the real beneficiary of the allegedly corrupt practices and absconding in law until the end of the matter, but there can be no ground reason for refusing to take advantage of the accused's acquittal. Their financial orders are adhered to without any financial gain. It was in accordance with the principles of accountability court justice and did not face any kind of illegal interference or abortion of justice. Intervention is not guaranteed in the interest of good governance, with the officials having the right to perform their duties The officers should provide protection otherwise they will be reluctant. With this decision and / or the same excuse or avoidance or prolongation that will eventually lead to the paralysis of the state machinery and no such case can be put up by the Supreme Court where such officers should be protected. There was no direct evidence of any corruption. In this case, the prosecutor has no knowledge of the litigation or any illegal benefit at the National Accountability Bureau in this case. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Cherat lawyer