Find a Lawyer

BABAR AZIZ KARIM versus K.B.C.A.

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42, 54 and 56 (d) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VII, R I1 Karachi Buildings and Town Planning Regulations, 1978, Regln 16 Sindh Buildings Control Ordinance (V of 1979), Section 19 Sindh The Building Control (Amendment) Ordinance (XJXVII of 2001), the Section 2 suit and the Declaration of Ummah filed a lawsuit to protect its construction, which was laid down in the deviation of the sanctioning scheme after 23 of 2002. The plaintiff's argument was that his case was subject to the provisions of Sindh. The ordinance (XXXVII of 2001) allowed 3 12 2001 to regularize such construction. The justification for such construction is the Sindh Buildings Control (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXVII of 2001), which was in place on 12th 2001 and, of course, any construction needs to be regulated. After the implementation of the Sindh Buildings Control (Amendment) Ordinance (XX, XVII of 2001), violation of the law of any approved project would not fall under its scope as it was issued for the same purpose. The Karachi Buildings Control Authority's proper action against regulating certain existing structures could not be protected by the plaintiff's illegal activities, without a good reason to approach the plaintiff due to presenting the case. Had approached the court with good intentions. It has been claimed that it is not under building regulations and cannot be allowed under Sections 42 and 56 (d) of the Special Relief Act, 1877; oh, VI, R 11, the plaint was rejected under CPC. had gone. ask a advocate free from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer