Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR HAYAT versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) value of the evidence and the sudden provocation of the tomb, the prosecutor's plea was successful in proving the case against the accused that he had equipped with a dagger and struck a blow to the left of the victim's chest. It was enough to cause death on the path of a modest nature. Eyewitnesses were residents of the same area with no previous hostility, the accused confessed to his presence on the spot and he struck the victim with a knife. The only difference of circumstances is that the defense tried to alter the offense under section 2302 (b), the offense under section 2302 (c) of the PPC, the offense under PPC and the sudden provocation because The defense dispute was stopped when the accused did not appear. Immediately after the incident, police disappeared for eight days and then pleaded that the woman's case had been repeated. But did not divulge details to the investigating officer who later told the investigating officer that he had snatched the knife from the dead and made the same blow from the said knife record. On the other hand, it turned out that the accused was in possession of a knife and had inflicted a severe blow on the deceased person, most of the questions about the defense request were misidentified by the Investigation Officer through a better version. The defendant could not be accepted during the trial unless the defendant's request was obtained from the record with some material or records. The defense failed to obtain anything because of a sudden provocation from the cross examination of the prosecution's witnesses. Hot patent advocate from Gilgit lawyer