Find a Lawyer

SHAMSUL HAQ versus AURANGZEB

Sections 135, 141 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the respondent's request for the division of section 42 tribal property on behalf of the applicants, a declaration on the issue of production in the Civil Court Revenue Officer. A request was made to stop the distribution process due to. Initially, the order issued by the High Court continued, but it later revised the order and did not close the process on the basis that a joint owner could file a petition for division of the Agricultural Land Distribution Revenue Officer. In the jurisdiction of the respondents who were jointly recorded in the Revenue Record, whose validity was not challenged, in the suit of the civil suit, the applicant admitted that the property was the death of his father. After the parties had transferred in equal shares, but the applicant had divided the property under division No longer challenged the title of the veterans. Respondents were partners in joint property who have the right to set aside their property because, under the Hare Law, the case was not compatible with the case for division of the case, since the case was not related to the case of divisional property. , The law disallows distribution process: Board of Revenue dismisses review request top advocates from Shankiari lawyer