SAIQA versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI
On the basis of Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule to Pakistan (1973) Article 199, the dissolution of the marriage ?? case against the wife for recovery of the indoor and restoration allowance was consolidated against all three cases, but Duty refund received for dissolving the marriage by order and the unpaid Dwyer amount previously paid and the maintenance order for the wife in favor of the wife, whether the Dover is paid or unpaid for any benefit or Cannot be restored in the form of a gift. The idea of divorcing Khula was not sustainable in granting Khulla's grant but the duty of the husband on the condition of payment of the dower's payment to the wife and to avoid unpaid indoor money for the court. He himself had inherited his wife. Such care was not in the nature of a gift or benefit to care for, but the husband had an undeniable legal obligation to maintain his wife, which he would not be able to secure without justification. In such cases, there would be a contradiction, if, on the one hand, the court found the wife legally entitled to claim restitution and on the other hand instructed her to refrain from it. The court accepted the constitutional petition and upheld the decree dissolving the marriage through Khulla.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
