Find a Lawyer

DIAMOND POLYMERS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 50 (5) CBR Circular No. 13 1998, 2 10 1998 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 9 Reduction in tax on imports from Assisi of Jammu And the tax deduction in import tax was not transferred by the AJ&K tax authorities to the AJK government. The tax authorities did not have to return such money to the state exchequer in AJK or to return it. Refused to give credit for tax not deposited in the Treasury as per the section 50 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 regarding the amount of tax collected by the Government Ink. The MX Tax Ordinance belongs to the collection of the Second Tax of 1979, there was no dispute and the only problem was, there was no issue with regard to recovery. Credit of this amount is in Azad Jammu and Kashmir which, according to the authorities, was possible only when the money was sent by the Government of Pakistan to Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The two governments, which had to take steps to resolve the issue of tax collection made under section 50 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, before the Central Board of Revenue Circular No. 13. 1998, dated 2 10 1998 Taxes were collected from the reviewers of Azad Kashmir under section 50 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and were entitled to credit in one way or the other by the Federal Tax Ombudsman. Revenue can be taken up with the relevant ministry so that the Central Board of Revenue Circular No. 13, 1998 to 2 dated 1998, is responsible for the collection of A / C importers related to the collection under section 50 (5) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. Solve the problem immigration advocates email from Narowal lawyer