Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus RANA HAKIM ALI

Special Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XIII, R 4 suit, which declares and affirms the Permanent Order of the Ummah, which claims that it has been in possession of the suit plot for the last 8 years and The house has been demanded. At the time of the trial, the case was not present and the plaintiff Appellate Court had no plot, claiming it was entitled to its allotment. And the suit plot does not show up in the colony plan. The plaintiff claimed to have been in possession of the suit plot for the last 18 years, neither presented any site plan nor paid tax on the secretary, housing committee. There was no receipt and no one was there. Any utility utility bill or needle gas connection was obliged to prove the existence of a suit plot in accordance with the scheme developed by the plaintiff Housing and Physical Plaza. The Enning Department, Government of Punjab, but he failed to do so but according to law the position slip could not be proved and was exhibited under OXIII, R14, CPC, which cannot be read in evidence by the appellate court. Was. The plaintiff denied the declaration that if suit plot was available later, as per Circular No. SO (B II) / (IV) 93, Government of Punjab, Housing & Physical Planning Department Appellate No. 23 Will be dealt with accordingly. The court upheld the trial court's rationale that the content was illegal, the High Court accepted the review request, set aside the judgment and the ruling, and dismissed the trial with costs. Restored trial ask a advocate free from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer