Find a Lawyer

SAHIBZADA FAROOK ANWAR ABBASI versus APPELLATE AUTHORITY/DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR

Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 RR 2 (XXV), 16 (3) (iii) and 18 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the petitioner and deputy Nazim joint candidate nominating multiple papers Submission With a Moderate Controversy Two different vice presidents were in the process of submitting three papers by the candidate for the nominee's seat in each nomination, in one set of nomination, the nominee for the nominee's seat was a different person. ? In the second seat, the nominee withdrew his candidature while the nominee in the second seat was willing to contest, but in the third seat the deputy refused to withdraw his candidature and the nomination papers were rejected by the returning officer and dismissed his appeals. ????? The Appellate Authority had raised by the petitioners that the submission of nomination papers was ineligible as mentioned under RR 18 (3) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 20. 00Validity candidates submitted nominations to two different papers and violated the provisions of R16 of Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 with a different deputy candidate and disqualified them from participating in the election by applicants. As a deputy nominee who refused to give up his papers, the applicant was not nominated as an honorable candidate in the meaning of section 2 (xxvi) of Punjab Local Government R Election Rules, 2000, and since both papers were nominated They were disastrous, so they would be rightly rejected even at the time of scrutiny It was. Under the constitutional request, the authorities made R18 of Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 top advocate from Lalamusa lawyer