Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR NAWAZ versus SANJEEDA KHATOON

Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 and OIX, R6 for the collection of money by ex-husband to dissolve the marriage on the basis of applicant ground Against the ex-wife after receiving the decree. It is requested that he borrowed Rs 60,000 as loan on the respondent's wish. And after finding out that he had obtained the case, he demanded his return, but eventually a case was registered against him, but the trial court's case was not satisfied. The appeal filed by the petitioner is dismissed. The applicant was that since the earlier evidence filed by him was invalid, the courts should have the order. To succeed in such a case, such a case was completely misunderstood as a plaintiff and had to stand on its own feet and not have to be red on the other side's weakness. It was completely impossible that one person, who had received notice of the debt being dissolved in marriage. The amount of Rs 60,000 to his ex-wife does not want to be taken into account that after the three-month decree passed by Khulla to dissolve her marriage, the respondent is not in any way with any person. Money will withhold, against which he is subjected to hatred because of violence, mutual lack. Confidence and affection and those who made allegations of misconduct against her applicant did not deny such allegations of vandalism, nor did she know of such circumstances. Any attempt to postpone the interpretation of Khulla afterwards female advocates from Sara e Naurang lawyer