XCI O XVII, Rr 1 (3) and 3 of the Civil Procedure Code Order XVII omitted the adjustment nomination for no good reason provided numerous opportunities for the plaintiff to present evidence, but despite the fact that he Failed to present the case when its hearing was adjourned 17. The trial court dismissed the case filed under O XVII, R 3 after granting a warrant to the plaintiff, that the plaintiff's CPC had held that the trial court had ruled in O XVII, R 1 (3). ) On the accuracy of the CPC. O XVII, R 1 (3), CPC was also not barred from excluding the case after which it failed to bring any case to record and proceeded for the court to proceed. Was made impossible when the court made the trial impossible. The trial court in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
