Find a Lawyer

SHAKOOR NAYAB versus MATI AHMAD

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 to prove the present facts of the suit for statutory ownership of property by the courts under oons Failed to prove that he was the owner of the suit property. Both courts simultaneously dismissed the case, as well as the legality of the petition filed by the plaintiff, failing to indicate that the plaintiff did not read any evidence or read any evidence on record. The evidence on the record was admired and the dispute arising out of such testimony was made legally, and no illegal or instability of the verdict was identified by anyone who knew any particular fact. Claims / alleges it and wants the court to believe that such fact exists. To prove the existence of such facts, in the present case, the applicants could not successfully prove that they are the owner of the suit land. Either by inheritance or exchange and because the defendants had no interest in settling their case with the same ounces which was on the claimants who failed to prove their claim and version in the Plaintiff's High Court and both of them. Refused to interfere with decisions passed by, lower courts were dismissed under review divorce advocates from Jehangira lawyer