Find a Lawyer

JUMA KHAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code S: 302 (b), 324 and 84 Definition of Evidence Applying the Low Liability Theory The defendant shot the victim in the case of enforcement and the prosecution witnesses were upset over their cricket game. And there were two versions of the suspect. Not only was the victim's wounds suffered, neither the door of the defendant's house was broken or his house was attacked so that he could give a reason to shoot the victim and others in self-defense. It did not confirm such a request either through defense evidence or through it. In its statement under section 340 (2), the CC accused admittedly did not bring his case under the provisions of section 84, PPC, but he was trying to increase the request for reduced liability, , Was not available before the trial court under PPC defense. Tried to obtain a record of the mental disorder of the accused and applied for it, although at intermittent sessions in 1996 the psychologist's theory about the mental state of the accused came into the record which was not exhibited. Was gone, but it could be considered because it helped the court to define the terms of MEN's REA or automatism and also saved. In this case, the parties had no intention of preventing the remand orders and further delays even if no cricketer had fallen into the house of the accused and no door of his house had been broken which caused him Was the reason for the purchase. Because of this he was suffering which made him out of control and he committed the act because there were such possibilities, immigration advocates email from Kakul lawyer