Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMJAD versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 R88 Civil Procedure Code (VS 1908), O VII, R 11 & O IX, R 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition declared invalid on 2 nd 2001 application for illegal proceedings , When it was decided to hear the arguments on the petition filed by the applicant under Case O VII, R 11, the CPC respondents' request for restoration of the election petition was due to a misunderstanding. Had noted the wrong date of the Tribunal had not found any date for hearing of the re-election petition. There was a wind, but such a request was made to hear the arguments. If the tribunal could proceed against the election applicants in all the petitions, it should still have been considered, the answer which was earlier Since the words on record are used in the hearing history \ as used in OI, R 9, CPC, Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 was not used in R88 and in the absence of any difference. Referring to the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 KR-88, the election phase of the election petition was made to abolish. After the formation of the proceedings, the trial begins and when the parties are demanded to remove the default presented in the RR. 88 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2000 has to be at a stage, when the trial has begun, the respondents did not even file a written statement in the election petition but the meter was still in the process of scrutinizing the election. For which do not exclude it immigration advocates email from Talhur lawyer