Find a Lawyer

SAZIA SULTANA versus RAZIA BEGUM

CPC Appeals Civil Procedure Code Order XLI Original Order O XLI, Rr 30 and 17 Appeal Defined by Appellant Neither the lawyer for the appellant was present nor heard nor the respondents A lawyer is in a position to discuss the matter. In view of the direction of the High Court Member Inspection Kim by the District Judge, so that the appeal can be decided on a fixed date, in particular, the remedy of the appeal, in particular, is that the first appeal is a right which is a suit law. The civil procedure code itself, when the appeal is preferred by a party, is an unconstitutional right to hear the whistle of a dispute, which is, without the direction of nature in accordance with the law, controversial or Cannot be exceeded. The High Court's inspection team, which was highly administrative in nature, could not be made the basis for denying the right to a hearing to the appellants, as was conceived by OXLI, R 30, CPC Court. The administration of justice is expected to maintain a balance of responsibility and responsibility, so that the matter does not face unnecessary delays, nor can it be remedied in a hurry. The law may be violated and there may be judicial power or jurisdiction to administer justice. According to the law, no executive or administrative directive or directive cannot be relied upon to respect the court, so that the streams of justice are kept clean and unobtrusive, it is expected to give up every direction / direction. And act purely according to the law. Member of the High Court, Inquiry online advocate from Wazirabad lawyer