THE STATE versus DR. DAD MUHAMMAD KHAWAJA KHAIL
National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 185 (3) The arguments were that the appellate court accepted the bargaining petition against the provisions of section 25 (a) of the NAB Ordinance. That the State Council was given no opportunity to seek instruction from the National Accountability Bureau and to be released without adjustment of funds, without calculating the responsibility of the accused in the matter of money. The appeal was already heard by the High Court and the verdict was reserved and was not decided on April 10, 2002, when it was nominated for hearing and the state passed the invalid order without proper opportunity of hearing. had gone. That the High Court upheld part of the judgment of the Accountability Court to the extent of disqualification of the accused, but nothing was expressed in relation to his sentence for a period of nine years, and that the verdict was not The dismissal was that the eyes of the law were not sustainable, against which no limit would be imposed; after the appeal hearing was allowed, the appeal was granted, however, at the time of the appeal hearing, the question regarding the limitation was decided. The condemnation will be examined.
famous lower court advocate from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer
