ARSHAD BIBI versus ALI MUHAMMAD
Section 47 and O XXI, Rr 100, 103 of the Code of Conduct was implemented on the application of the decree on which the petition was filed. The petition related to the petition was heard, the order was executed. , The confiscation of the property was handed over to the decree. And the record of the execution file was assigned to record that the order was satisfied when the notice was issued and the execution file was attached to the record, the petition was dismissed as invalid. The first appeal against the request of the Executive Court, under section 47 and O XXI, Rr 100 & 103, CPC provisions, was bound to decide the application and satisfaction questions of Order XXI, RR 100 & 103 , CPC added that all questions concerning title and occupation were to be decided by the Implementing Court as well as a separate case by the following court. They were expressly forbidden, without legal jurisdiction and no jurisdiction, only because the property was granted custody and the High Court was satisfied under the jurisdiction of the order. It rejected the orders of both the courts with the directive that the execution court would ask for a prosecution record. Run the lawsuit and decide on the objection request
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Sahiwal lawyer