Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, BANNU versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD


Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 52A, 52, 50 (2A), 56, 138 and Second Schedule, Part I, CL (86) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 9 Section R 594 (I) / 91, dated 30 6 1991, CBR Letter C No. (37) / WHT / 91, dated 2 2002 2002 Recovery from a person who did not deduct tax nor collect his isice. Used to go The tax exemption commission in the tax source exemption certificate was issued by the Assisi / Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education on 30 6 1991, pursuant to Section R 594 (I) / 91 of the Income Tax, on the basis of such an exemption certificate. The savings center had then withdrawn the exemption certificate through the Commissioner Income Tax on the profits received on its deposits and the dismissing officer was instructed to recover the Income Tax as per Section 50 (2A) of the Income Tax. Can be deducted under. Corruption in the ordinance, 1979 idity Val Ma Val is disclosed on a number of matters, first decided to follow the proportion of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Central Insurance Company and other CBR 1993 SCC 1049. Therefore, the Central Board of Revenue should be advised and refrain from issuing directives on grounds. On their interpretation, of the law; Secondly, the Commissioner Income Tax had no authority to withdraw from the previous interpretation, as per the certificate issued in accordance with Section RO 594 (I) / 91, and the certificate issued by the Commissioner. By doing this, it is gross injustice to the payer. Such receipts of income tax, which was applicable to any recipient of Section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, did not amount to tax deduction for the recipient.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Bajaur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.