MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus THE STATE
In addition to the section 302/109 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the accused trial court, the appellate court also rejected the school leaving certificate presented by the accused. That was the conclusion. He was not less than 18 years old on the day of the incident when the accused did not provoke his minority during the investigation and did not produce any documentary evidence, but for the first time in this case, After which appeared ocular. The account presented by the eyewitnesses, including the injured witness, was fully corroborated by the recovery of the weapon of offense on the medical evidence, motive, suspect and positive serologist's report. The suspect reportedly committed the cold-blooded murder of his mother-in-law and his mother in a brutal and cruel manner and did not deserve any relaxation in the case of the sentence. Peel was denied accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Mian Chunnu lawyer