Find a Lawyer

GHULAM AKBAR LASI versus RETURNING OFFICER FOR NA-270, AWARAN-CUM-LASBELLA AT UTHAL

Representation of the Public Act 1976 Section 99 (1A) (i) Conducting the General Election Order (7 of 2002), Article 8D (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 63 (P) National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XVIII) (For 1999), section 15, provisions and 25 [since the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance (XXXV of 2001) has been replaced] The issue of ineligible voluntary withdrawal / plea to contest election with the National Accountability Bureau by the accused / candidate Not collecting funds was found to be a candidate Returning Officer disqualified after the National Accountability Bureau took advantage of the application bargaining under section 25 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance. What's going on, request raised by the candidates was that they did not enter the application. The transaction itself and the money were not personally tendered / deposited, therefore, cannot be disqualified under Section 15 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, justified in participating in the general election. Since the candidate was arrested on specific charges and the provision was released after taking advantage of a viable provision, the candidate could not say that he had taken advantage of Section 25 of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance. No, when the 1999 candidate was detained, it was natural that this money would be deposited by him to another person and he could not deposit the money himself if the candidate did not benefit from the plea bargain. He could challenge it in front of any court. By law or at least applying! The chairman of the National Accountability Bureau, in the present case, remained silent until the papers of this candidate were rejected. jobs for fresh advocates from Garh Maharaja lawyer