Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSADAQ KH., ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER versus MUHAMMAD AKRAM KHAN RAO

R21 [as amended 11 10 1984 and 12 5 1988] Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 4 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) The relevant promotional appeal petitioner's tribunal limitation was that the time restriction was imposed before the service tribunal as the representation presented on 23 1992 1992 remained unannounced for more than 120 days and the defendant timely sent the tribunal. Did not request jurisdiction, but was advised to seek answers on 10 7 1994. Rejection of representation, which will not extend the time for filing an appeal. Since initially, the promoter's failure to qualify for the Departmental Examination was a violation of the Central Engineering Services Class I Rule, which was amended in 10 10 1984, so he, as an Assistant Executive Engineer. B17 was not eligible for consideration for further development. The Service Rules did not facilitate the promotion of Assistant Engineer B 16 to the position of Assistant Executive Engineer B 17 in 1984, but the amendments to the Service Rules 12 5 1988 include provisions for such promotion that the Department The exams are about implementation. 10 of which will not be possible and disappointing since 1984. Since the Service Rules have been amended, 11 10 1984 did not provide any facility for such promotion, so the service tribunal declared it wrong to remove the error and the service tribunal did not consider the impact of the quota system. What was more, the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal further consideration. Case online advocate from Talagang lawyer