Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) and A 337A (i) definition of evidence, reducing the incidence of sentence reduction. The suspect confessed to his presence and confessed that he had a gun, he further admitted that the shot was accidentally hit on the back of the shoulder. My witnesses to the deceased could not be said to be interested witnesses in their relationship with the witness without any hostility, the Ocular Account was fully confirmed by medical evidence, the defendant's statement that the accidental gun Was gone, was not credible, the trial court found that it was not so premature killing, but the incident was not acceptable at that time because the complaining party first went to the police station about the incident. Then the accused party tried to stop them and urged them not to go to the police station and when the complaining party accepted it. Denied, the suspect fired at the victim, which proved to be a fatal circumstance, however, the accused was in favor of the accused, because the complainant and the deceased were not linked to the motive, but if the motive Someone was with those who were injured in the first incident when the prosecution was compiled by the prosecution, then the prosecution was obliged to prove it too, but the prosecution had failed to do so. Proved his case, but the motive given by the prosecution in the FIR was not the whole truth, and whatever The incident took place, no one knew that the accused was not shot repeatedly. Section 2302 (b), p list of supreme court advocates from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer