KARIM BAKHSH versus JAN MUHAMMAD
Section 8 suits were already settled in the first phase of litigation, in relation to property ownership claims and the vacancy of the estate, by which it was decided that the plaintiffs of the settlement settlement authorities had submitted the allotment by the plaintiff. The owner of the lookout property. The plaintiff never challenged the allotment order in favor of the plaintiff, who had finalized, in the presence of the pre-allotment order in favor of the plaintiff, the collector had no right to treat the property as a government land. The passenger should pass a new order of allotment in favor of the plaintiff, especially since the civil court found that the suit property was a vacant property and the trial case below was concurrent and invalid of any kind. In the absence of a reading of the statement or the evidence on record, such result cannot be interfered with by the High Court in review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Mangi lawyer
