Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus HAMID ALI ALIAS AHMAD ALI

Appeal against the definition of section 171717 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 302 (c) and 324 evidence, no evidence on record to prove the motive of the case set up in the FIR trial court Was brought up, in the circumstances, that was not truly the purpose of unbelief. The alleged witnesses in the case could not disclose the purpose of their presence near the murder site and they did some improvement during the trial. The accused was only 14/15 years old and was very weak and weak and The prosecution's witnesses were adult and elderly, claiming that witnesses saw the incident and escaped the suspect after the incident, in the presence of three such witnesses was not possible to explain the presence of the injured witness. I was unsuccessful the accused was only 15 years old while his partner injured in the incident was an adult during extraordinary hours. The circumstances of the conviction were that the accused was charged with committing an unnatural crime by the deceased and injured witness alone, and that the accused tried to rescue the deceased and injured witness in order to save himself. He was injured. If there is evidence on record two, different opinions can be formed in relation to the same incident, then it should be in favor of the accused who has been tried for justice. The trial court, in the circumstances, rightly accepted the prosecution's case and the trial court presented the case for acquittal from the trial. Accused by the allegations under Section 2302 (c) / 4 charges4, the PPC was neither backward nor his defense and, under the jurisdiction of the High Court, jobs for fresh advocates from Gari Mori lawyer