Find a Lawyer

IHTISHAM HAIDER SHAH versus THE STATE

Definition of section 2302 (b) / ?88 / ?99 evidence showed that ten persons were named accused, one of the accused was acquitted due to compromise between the parties and other persons were still in large numbers. The identification parade was not held in the FIR. In the case, the complainant did not know the name of the accused and the police had told him the name of the accused. During the physical remand, the accused could not be recovered. The fire was so close that it was pointed out that none of the three witnesses had specifically said that two student organizations were present in the FIR or before a trial court. There was enmity between the two and the adjudicator was under trial in the same litigation. In the event of suspicion of the parties, the accused's participation was set aside by the trial court to bring the accused to the sentencing sentence, taking advantage of the doubt. how to become a advocate from Jhand lawyer