Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RAZZAQ versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) definition of evidence was not available direct evidence against the accused and the circumstances were based on the last evidence stated by the complainant and the prosecution witnesses regarding the attendance. Last seen evidence. Was not enough to sustain. The victim was suspected of having illicit relations with the wife of the accused, but after some days he was explained by the complaining party and no jirga was examined in this regard, therefore the prosecution witness Were in a relationship and no free rhythm from the deceased was brought to the record. In four successive investigations against the accused to maintain their conviction, the accused were acquitted, except that an accused under the supervision of the Superintendent of Police Range Crime was found guilty without any other evidence submitted against them, The litigation against them was not extended to any doubt. Through trial court, the accused had the benefit of doubt, conviction and punishment aside and he was acquitted of the charge. best law firm from Dina lawyer