Find a Lawyer

NAEEM DAR versus THE STATE

Sections 2302 (b) and 8338D were defined as a single accused who allegedly committed murder during the day, both of the prosecution's witnesses naturally dismissed against the accused and none of them Neither exaggerated the incident nor gave any version that was inconsistent or contradictory. The witnesses' stand was fully supported by the facts, circumstances and medical evidence; the accused was to be immediately listed in the FIR, which was identified by the victim's relatives, in the case of an accused, the prosecution's witnesses There was no enmity between the two. And neither the accused nor any of the circumstances was on record to show that the witnesses had any motive to wrongly corroborate the statements of the accused from both witnesses, and this proved to be true, in the absence of any seriousness. Even so, the defendant's conviction can be very securely maintained. Pieces of evidence The medical evidence also supported the time, duration and location of the prosecution case. According to witnesses, the injuries sustained are confirmed by medical evidence. The fact is that the police did not rectify any crime during the investigation on the spot, and there is no report on the use of criminal weapons during the incident. The defendant's affirmative action has further strengthened the trial; the trial sentenced the accused to death and sentenced him to death. Given to the accused, Section 338D is certified under PPC advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer