Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DAD versus ASGHAR KHAN

Para 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition A pre-emption suit was filed by the applicant on the ground of being sued by the applicant on the ground that the collector had decided and The pre-emptor case was dismissed by the rival, but the collector's appeal was rejected by the Additional Commissioner, who filed the judgment in favor of the competing pre-emptor and rejected it. The decision and order were affirmed in its constitutional application by the Member Board of Revenue Petitioner. In its statement, the seller of the suit land challenged the decisions and administration orders given below that the rival pre-emptor was not a tenant of the suit land at the time of sale and that the rival pre-emptor himself admitted to the collector that He was not in control. For the last three or four years, the competitor's pre-emitter of the suit land has fully proven that he is not in the possession of the suit and, as a tenant, has rejected the registration of the records which show him as the tenant in the Revenue Record. For the last ten years, as a tenant of his will he seized the land, not only from the oral evidence, but also from the relevant period on the basis of the record of income from measles. His claim was also supported by the Additional Commissioner to ascertain the fact that the revenue record contradicts the oral evidence, misrepresentation And would not suffer from reading the evidence, the Board of Revenue neither discussed any evidence nor participated in the dispute in light of the oral evidence available on record. list of advocates from Risalpur lawyer