ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
Section 2? b (b) / 2 2 ????? Definition of evidence, although reduction of FIR against unknown attackers was recorded, the complainant in the FIR provided details of the escaped attacker and By her character, the witness was legally identified by the prosecution witnesses in the identification parade. The identification parade was held, observing all the legal formal observations that there was no possibility of the defendant's replacement or replacement, the effect of the recovery of the ring and other articles returned by the accused was also seized by him. The Ocular account against the defendant presented by the three witnesses was also verified by independent and neutral witnesses. All the victims of the robbery and there was no enmity with the accused for their dismissal, all witnesses unanimously said that further evidence of the accused dismissed in the pending prosecution case was presented through medical evidence. And a medical examination of the injured was also carried out. The condition of the suspects was maintained, eyewitnesses said, the other suspects were equipped with carbines, but their possession had the effect of retrieving the gun, the seized spaces were replaced by the Franz Science Laboratory. The accused was not sent to retrieve the weapons of the crime. , Was irrelevant and did not result in firing from both sides as the people on the spot also opened fire on the accused, which killed two attackers and also injured the accused since both sides. Cross-fired, this is not a valid death sentence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Bhirya Road lawyer