Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD MASIH versus THE STATE

Prior to the arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 381, the accused was specifically mentioned in the petition for the complainant who had committed the theft of the vehicle mentioned in the FIR Complainant. Had specifically stated that the accused and his accomplices were involved first. In the case in which the vehicle was stolen and cheated in this case, special charges were leveled against the accused, who failed to disclose any reason for his false allegations on bail prior to his arrest. , Was to protect innocent citizens and it was arbitrary. Relief could only be used in favor of innocent civilians, but in the case of the suspects, sufficient evidence was available on the record that required full investigation that could only take place before the accused was arrested on a bail grant, In the meantime, the investigation will definitely be a hindrance. Recovery was not yet in effect, the suspect arrested, failed to present his case for bail before the appellant's statement was dropped famous lower court advocate from Chitral lawyer