Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN versus MST. MEHVISH

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The petitioner (father) for the restoration of a pending suit for constitutional remand was directed by the Family Court to provide interim care to at least one child per applicant. 1500 per month. Not satisfied with the Family Court order, an appeal was filed against him and the petitioner finally challenged him in the same constitutional petition, the Family Court was capable of providing interim care to minors. The interim order was passed by the Family Court, the constitutional application against this order was not applicable as the applicant's financial status can be decided only after recording the evidence of the parties and any judicial error and legal proceedings. An order passed by the Family Court in the absence of stability cannot be interfered with in the constitutional petition advocates from Jacobabad lawyer