Find a Lawyer

MIAN SHEHZAD-UD-DIN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE S&E CHIEF SETTLEMENT

Sections 11, 12,13 and 14 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Withdrawal of Property and Displaced Persons (repealed) Act (XIV of 1975), Section 2 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 ( 1) (a) (i) Constitutional Request Only Permanent Transfer Agreement was issued to the respondents predecessor for the building only on 176 1968, which is a special mention that the property belonging to the Municipal Committee Highway Department has been given the land. Claimed and issued notice for his leave to the Chief Settlement Commissioner, who, in his order, said that according to the record of the revenue, all part of the land was with the provincial government and the municipal committee, on this land. But he had no title or right and his name was incorrectly entered in the permanent transfer deed. And after the Settlement Law appeal, there was no arrangement for allocation of alternative property. Thereafter 428 kanals, 5 marla land were allotted. Under Section 12 (2), the ridiculous price of Rs 22,055 and the C-valued price were transferred to the CPC in order to withdraw such directions of the High Court as they too, without any jurisdiction, correctness to the Chief. The Settlement Commissioner expressed his inability to order alternative allotments in favor of the respondents. The cancellation of the Settlement Rules, thus, meant for them to set before the High Court that an alternative allotment that they failed to make and its order under Article 199 (1) was false and non-binding. There was a legal High Court. (a) (i) Only those applicants through the Constitution immigration advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer