Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAQ versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 2302 witnessed the incident at around 7pm in mid-July when enough sunlight was available and things can be seen through witnesses who were the real brother of the victim, who witnessed the incident himself. Was. Occurred in the instant presence of the complainant, had acquired a thorough knowledge of the facts and had to file an FIR immediately before the case, which proved that the witnesses present at the scene were present on both occasions. Witnesses gave full details of their statements before the trial court. And while examining the contents of the post-mortem report, the accused was brought in with specific charges against gunfire allegations that stated that the deadly wounds on the main organs were very dangerous and did not take long to die. The two witnesses each testified the other and their statements were confirmed by medical evidence The witnesses were no pretrial In this case the witnesses were accused of prolonged scrutiny, but the witnesses were denied any evidence. Did not experience any kind of defect or defect, so he was charged with false accusations in this case. Yes. Proved to be a completely credible witness, the trial court rightly dismissed the testimony of the defense witnesses because what they described was an obvious lie which he failed to allege, the case against them. Was able to punish the lessor anyway. The FIR was clearly mentioned and the circumstances were on the record, which internally called on the accused to kill an innocent person. patent advocate from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer