Find a Lawyer

NAEEM UR REHMAN versus THE STATE

The testimony of section 302 evidence was disclosed to the doctor who allegedly examined the deceased before the death and could not be ascertained before the complainant in view of the critical condition of the victim and the medic. There was no mention of the legal declaration. The report's statement that the statement of death would otherwise be fabricated and falsified has no prior background of hostility between the parties, nor is there any motive in the FIR, nor in the statement of witnesses under section 161, c. CP's prosecution witnesses, including the complaining party, approached the police station about a month before the alleged empty and pistol used by the accused after a four-hour incident outside the police station. The firearm was sent to a specialist, although some suspicions were found in the prosecution's story, but there was no precedent for hostility. There is no question of false involvement of the accused in the case which was a single shot and the motive was that the accused was charged with molestation, even though the crime of killing an accused was taken home. This was not a logical conclusion for me to bring, but it was related to the issue of punishment where the motive was not established by the prosecution. The death sentence was considered negligence and the transport life imprisonment would be sufficient to meet the extremity of justice, the defendant fired and fired from the country if the trial did not prove a repeat offense. Was given, but the death sentence was reduced. Life in prison pakistani advocates Hub Inds Estate lawyer