Find a Lawyer

NASRULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE

Definition of Section 2302 Evidence The convict was an eyewitness to the prisoner's circumstances, but the other person, having no connection with the complaining party, filed an FIR immediately about which the ocular account and the medical There was no dispute between the evidence, the FIR suggests, is the nature of the firearm and injury seating. Properly given by the complainant, the incident was not an unforeseen event as the only witness, besides the brother of the deceased, was an independent witness who had no motive to make false allegations. There was no alternative. He was under the age of 18 at the time of the incident; he did not mention his age in his statement under Section 342, CRPC, although he was being represented by a berth certificate presented by the accused, But he was not admissible in the evidence because he was not properly tendered because it was stated that the author of the certificate had not been presented to prove its contents before the trial motion in the FIR. The case against him was proved successfully, the incident had happened before, no one knew and the accused had not shot. S case was presented to the conditions in favor of the accused. The lower sentence was found to be a crime, but the accused was sentenced to life in prison immigration advocates contact from Machh lawyer