Find a Lawyer

NAZAR ABBAS versus THE STATE

The prosecution's witnesses, appearing in court during the appreciation of evidence 302/324/34, appeared in court and did not involve the accused and went one step further, stating that they had seen the assailants, But the accused whose trial was not, the prosecution's witnesses gave only because of the fear that under section 161, CRPC, in view of the incidents and circumstances found in the country. The statements of the two witnesses of the prosecution recorded four and a half months after the incident did not occur. The statement of the prosecution's witnesses stated that the two witnesses could not rely on 6e, in which case the accused's name was not included in the accused's list. A prosecution witness did not include the accused's name in his statement. And the accused failed to prove his case in the prosecution circumstances, it was said that the accused was tried and sentenced by the trial court, according to which he presented medical evidence. Yesterday, the doctor's body was acquitted of charges against the doctor who performed the autopsy. The doctor who examined the injured prosecutor's witness said that the recovery of the accompanying victims was fully supported by the scene of the incident, and they also supported and supported prosecution witness testimony, however, in any case. The partner was able to prove his case against the accused. The co-accused, in the circumstances, was rightfully punished and sentenced solicitors from Kahuta lawyer