In its statement under section 161 of the 497 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/11 Bail, the CCP alleged that the prosecution witnesses had charged their adulteress Bill The above charges were imposed. Then he saw that the accused was taking the kidnapper to another city. The medical report stated that the abductor's statement was correct and that he had intercourse and there was sufficient record to link the suspect to the crime, which would have been contained in the prohibited clause of section 497 (1). , CC alleges, bail cannot be extended under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
