HASSAN FRAZ versus THE STATE
The pre-arrest of the Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 337/432/306/109/148/149 bail, the affirmation of the allegation against the accused was that they were the defendant's and the defendant's witnesses, Attacked, they allegedly armed, armed, attacked. The complainant was told the result of an election rivalry between the parties was that the accused was allowed pre-bail and the matter was posted - a cross version of the incident was also brought on record from the accused's report for further action. He was injured and seven defendants were cross-examined, who were found guilty at the time of the investigation. They were on bail. In general, the cross-version was treated the same way as the cross-sectional issue. All the accused were on bail, so the accused got bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kakul lawyer