KASHIF ALIAS MOULA versus THE STATE
Section 6565/7 377/1111 ???? Appreciating the evidence Victim boy who in his statement was named Cr16 Cr, CRPC and the accused before the trial court and identified him fully before the court. There was no enmity with the accused, no reason to deny the victim's testimony before the police or before the trial, the statement of the victim was confirmed by the complainant's statement, although the prosecution The two witnesses did not support the prosecution's case, but even if their statements were dismissed, the prosecution would still be prosecuted against the accused and At trial, the accused is convicted. The court was retained with some modifications
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mithi lawyer
