HAJI REHMAT ALI versus AKBAR ALI HASHMI
Evidence on the Section 12 suit record for the specific performance of the sale agreement has shown that the plaintiff (vendor) was attempting to approach defendant (s) before the due date to finalize the sale transaction. , But the plaintiff did not meet the plaintiff, who immediately filed only four cases. A few days after the target's date, which showed that the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform part of his contract. Defendants did not request in their written statement that the agreement was timely between the parties, except in the event that the defendant had not given an opportunity before the target's date. Notices, defendants, in writing or by buying stamp papers and drafting a sale contract, will not reflect on the preparation and consent of the defendant's statements to the witnesses, defendants attempt to avoid meeting the plaintiff with a clear objection. That the target's date should pass. And they have a lame excuse for avoiding a contract. The trial court, in the circumstances, did not justify dismissing the case that in fact the plaintiff did not pay part of his agreement by considering the balance until the due date. And the trial decision was set aside and the case was allowed by the High Court on appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer