Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus MUHAMMAD BAKHSH

A. XXXVII, Plaintiffs Rr 2 and 3 for recovery of the money on the basis of the promise claimant claimed that the Defendant had received a sum of Rs 24,000,000 from him as a loan to the two witnesses and The promise was executed on the Caliphate, presented by two witnesses, the plaintiff was interested in the proof of his claim, was co-dependent and had a common interest in apprehending the defendant to prove the execution of the alleged promise. No independent testimony was presented, and the plaintiff's facts, which came on record through the plaintiff's facts, showed that it could not be assumed that Ai, who is a poor tenant who cultivates other people's land and can lend money to the plaintiffs' court by hand, in the circumstances, dismissed the case right away and dismissed the trial court's decision. Was not requested. High Court Interference Pakistan, top advocate family court from Jehlum lawyer