MST. RAZIA BEGUM versus SHEIKH HASSAN ALI
Section 12 Legislative Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 59 and 72 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), specific performance of contract to sell section 96 document execution, proof of opinion of handwriting expert, trial defendant The source was not relied upon to have a sale agreement with the defendant who was the owner of the suit property The defendant refused to execute the contract The plaintiff himself purchased the stamp paper from the defendant by signing it. The matter could not be proved as the original author of the agreement had died and the other marginal witness did not know the plaintiff personally, both sides N presented the handwriting experts to prove the plaintiff's signature, who presented two different opinions, the trial court did not rely on any opinion and failed to reject the claim in favor of the plaintiff by the defendant. Prove the execution of the sale agreement in the trial court in favor of, even if the evidence on record was discussed, the participant's trial was not in accordance with the evidence presented by the parties regarding the decisions reached by the court. While the plaintiff's order was not upheld and was rejected by the High Court decision and the T There was an order passed by the Royal Court. Set aside and dismissed the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Jauharabad lawyer