Find a Lawyer

MIRZA WAHEED BEG versus MUHAMMAD FARID

Article 84 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Comparing the Signatures of a Section 12 Suit Agreement for Specific Performance of the Contract The plaintiff vendor of the court refused to sell the suit property to the claimant seller and the plaintiff also Claimed that she had sold the property to another defendant, and that the plaintiff, who was her tenant, thought that the plaintiff's signatures on some vacant documents were excluded from having an electrical connection to the suit property trial court. After doing so he claimed that the sale was a contract. Legally executed by the defendant, and the trial appellate court rejected the trial court's disclosures and dismissed the trial that no witness had confirmed the sale agreement, so he himself Would not be wrong in the same way when the law was martyrdom, 1984. Is not issued and when a law does not require the validation of a document by two wit, though it claimed that it had sold the suit property to another defendant but there was no record yet That the sale was done and the way it was completed was observed by the appellate court that the seller was not proved by the defendant as a sales contract, based on the comparison of the signatures. Could not be granted because the trial court was not an expert, under Article 84 of the 1984 testimony of the law, the Supreme Court was allowed Yves had the option of comparing signatures. Search on the basis of a court-comparing signature, with signed or substantiated signatures of the relevant party law firms from Guddu lawyer