Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB versus UMAR

Sections 2 (2) and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The effect of the termination of the Constitution Petition Settlement Act and the scope of the pending action shall mean that the land under the image rules against the certified claims. Initial steps should be taken for the allotment of Regarding the claimants, but the said rules could not be finalized before the cancellation of the said rules, and it was in respect of matters that provided that these persons would be taken forward and concluded under the settled rules. It would appear that the aforesaid rules were not repealed to that extent. The purpose and appointment of a notified officer was made to deal with such matters in order to pass the final order in such cases when occupying any vacancy under the provisions of Sections 2 and 3 under consideration. Delay is not a matter of action. In the present case the authority of the EQE Property and Homelessness Act (Cancellation) Act, 1975, had taken full action in making the allotment as an allotment without any jurisdiction. It was not a matter of proceedings under section 2 (2) of the TECE Property and Homelessness Act (1975) Act 1975, an order for such order to be held by the High Court without any legal authority. Was given. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Shahpur Chakar lawyer