Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ZAFAR versus MST. JAFRAN BIBI

A. XI, R12 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suite for the Respondent's request for a production of the original sales deadline respondent was that the sale was destroyed and not in possession. , The trial court instructed the defendant to produce a certified copy of the sale agreement, but on his failure to do so, he proceeded to withhold his defense and justified the matter. No provision of the CPC or any other law was affirmed, no party of unknown nature could be demanded. The document, which was not in its possession, can be obtained with a certified copy of the public document on payment and compliance with the usual charges to any member of the public, under the necessary procedure, which imposes a penalty for compliance with this decree. The punishment was thorough. The High Court, which was justified under any law or any principle of equity, set aside the impeachment decision / ruling, which would result in the case being subject to adjournment before the trial court. ith the law best law firm from Jehlum lawyer