Find a Lawyer

MALIK ANJUM FAROOQ PARACHA versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN

Article 12 Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, R 29 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court Scope If no forum was provided, to decide on election dispute or any alternative alternative available was not. Taking advantage of the relevant law by a provocative person against the orders of the election authorities, the constitutional request for a judicial review of the matter cannot be denied by the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution on the power of Article 225 of the Constitution. An official order has been issued. Was illegal or was granted outside the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction under which the powers were exercised, or it was violating the constitution or the law or was without jurisdiction, the quorum was illegal or illegal The constitutional petition can be challenged before the High Court applicant / candidate. In the present case, for the first time, the Local Government Election Ordinance, 2000, seeking the inherent powers of the Chief Election Commissioner under Section 12 of the Punjab, reformed the order passed by the District Returning Officer under the jurisdiction of the Chief Election Commissioner. Directed, the failure of the candidate to appear before the Chief Election Commissioner instead of immediately seeking the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. The district will not refuse to deny the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court against an order passed by the Returning Officer. The High Court may make a decision based on the order that no evidence is available on the record for face detection by the Chief Election Commissioner. They judge when you need a advocate from Quaidabad lawyer