Find a Lawyer

HAJI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MARKET COMMITTEE, GUJRANWALA

21, 67 (6) and 72 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Allotment of Plots for the Establishment of Fruit and Vegetable Market to the Farmers The Government decided to set up a new Fruit and Vegetable Market and for this purpose plots. For the purpose of the allotment, the market, an allotment committee constituted, was to be made through a public auction, but according to the deviation of the authority, which was reported to the MPA's brother, the defendant plotted after obtaining the resolution of the market committee. Allotted and addressed to the Minister of Agriculture in a letter to the former Minister of State for Agriculture in the letter to the Deputy Secretary that Is that R 67 (6), Punjab Agricultural Product Markets (General) Rules quota plots that were deemed as acceptance of the provisions of the monetization of 1979, can only dispose clear. The allotment was illegal in contravention of the aforementioned rule through a public auction and without any authority, the Minister, who had the letter, had no authority or authority to grant permission to the former post or to relax the rules as such. The options were solely by the government and they had to comply with certain conditions that were not implemented during the approval of the allotment orders. For further consideration of the jurisdiction and the Minister's order, the High Court declared it to be unlawfully granted, saying that the orders were declared manifestly illegal, delayed, if any. Appeal was not treated under Rule 21 (General) Rules, Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets in the orders lodging a constitutional petition against the petitioner, objecting that the applicant's alternative how to become a advocate from Kakur Town lawyer