Find a Lawyer

I.T.AS. NOS. 2173/KB TO 2175/K OF 2001, DECIDED ON 1ST JULY, 2002. versus I.T.AS. NOS. 2173/KB TO 2175/K OF 2001, DECIDED ON 1ST JULY, 2002.

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 156 Error Correction The error diagnosis was corrected because the error was on the record and, consequently, the next two years of studies were also validated. There was an error which was evident from the record The Assessment Officer corrected the Assessment Order while the Assessing Officer had a different method of counting the revenue and as a result there was a revenue error which was evident from the record and the Issuing The officer made the correction correctly, though the method of calculating his income was different. The charges were the result of a correctional assessment for the year 96/9696 and in accordance with the law maintained by the Appellate Tribunal. famous high court advocate from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer