Find a Lawyer

BAHADAR ALI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ARIFWALA, DISTRICT PAKPATTAN

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Family Court passed judgment in favor of the minor and the wife on 18-11 1999 that the minor is entitled to rehabilitation as long as he is of old age. And the wife deserves it unless she qualifies. The petition for the restoration of the petition (husband) as a wife was filed under which the petition was filed in the court and it was said that she was willing to pay the minor to the restitution allowance under the decree. The wife is not entitled to a rehabilitation allowance because she divorced him on 13 9 1997 and that she clearly stated in her statement before the Family Court on 29 7 1998, that she divorced his wife. Lee, who had not been examined for any part, meant that the fact of the divorce was acknowledged. True, the wife can claim maintenance for a maximum of three months, ie, the appeal petition object was dismissed by the trial court and the order was dismissed even after the appellant observed that she was against the order. The wife could seek a divorce request after having a scheduled 18, 1999, so that the rehabilitation proceedings could be proved by the court. No forum was challenged and the final position was obtained and thus the executing court had to be kept within the terms of the order, no case in the final decision of the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction. Did not guarantee interference with. Application only to the extent of charitable observation made by the Court of Appeal best advocate from Diamer lawyer