Section 1335 and 177 suits for the Section 8 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967) for the possession of immovable property were the view of the defendants that the defendants had infringed on their property, the record of the justification shows. The special suit was not the exclusive owner of the land and the defendants were also partners in the said land; no local commission was appointed by the court to limit it, but the defendants chose to present the defendant as a witness. Who acknowledged that the exact map was not prepared by the Tajiks, nor was the report on its signature a previous one. In this case, the local commission did not say whether the suit land was properly measured and delimited and could not be considered reliable evidence because the plaintiff was not the exclusive owner of the suit. , So they cannot claim any ownership. Land without a common pit distribution, and admit that he never went to the Revenue Officer for distribution or demarcation. The plaintiff was not the plaintiff to retain the case under section 135 and 177 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, and therefore under section 8 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, therefore, under review, the courts rightly rejected it. Excluded Rejected, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
