MEHFOOZ ALAM versus THE STATE
Section 230/4604/6060 / / / 34 / ?? ????? Definition of evidence was filed with the FIR promptly and it specifically designated the accused as a special offender who filed the complaint. The victim, who was the father of the victim, described it as a natural process. Observing the incident when it happened in his own home and he sustained firearm injuries to his own person during the incident, the presence of the complainant at the relevant time could not be a witness to the contentious prosecution which the complainant's brother And he lived in the house. According to her claim that sleeping in the compound of her brother's house and adjoining her brother's house with her common guests was neither unnatural nor unusual for the complainant and the prosecution witnesses. There was no serious motive for falsely involved in the case. The prosecution witnesses who made permanent statements before the trial court's accused and their credibility were dismissed, the prosecution's witnesses should not be killed during their trial, because of their clear and straightforward statements. The testimony was proved that the motive for the prosecution, which the defendants did not deny, was fully proved that the pistol was recovered from the accused, according to a report by the Franz Science Laboratory. Confirmation of departure Medical evidence provided the ocular account presented by the complainant and other eyewitness Was confirmed by the motive, recovery of the offensive weapon and medical evidence against which the case of litigation was proved. The accused co-accused gave the deceased an assurance
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Khuiratta lawyer